It's not "awful", it's a sad truth; there are simply not enough organs to go around.
Let's look at it this way: if you have two candidates available for transplant surgery but only one organ to give, and one was an otherwise healthy individual who would live a long and healthy life if given the transplant, and the other had so many preexisting conditions that would probably get in the way of the transplant working well, that's not exactly a difficult choice to make.
And it's not even about autism. Let's pick another two people....ummm how about a scholar-athlete at a college and a 50 year old smoker. Does the 50-year old smoker have an equal right to the transplant? Or should it go to the kid who is taking care of her health and getting an education and will probably do more? The scholar-athlete, of course, should get the transplant.
There is no ethics here, it's a simple list of pros and cons, and the guy in this article has more cons stacked against him. It sucks, it really is terrible and I am sorry this happens to anyone, but that's how it goes.
Log in to comment