@sargentd said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@sargentd said:
Eric Adam's mayor of NYC is getting stressed out by the influx of illegal aliens sent to NYC which is a "Sanctuary City". He says this crisis will destroy the city.
Pretty funny because he literally dealing with a fraction of a fraction of what places like Texas are dealing with. The numbers of illegals are nothing compared to Texas. Eric Adam's is requesting Billions in aid from Bidens administration to help with the issue. Good luck Adam's, they don't give shit to Texas why would they give money to you
.
Yes but Texas is a huuuuuuuuuuge amount of land filled with all manner of cities and towns and so on and so forth, with a large agricultural industry that actually benefits from immigration (legal or otherwise), whereas NYC is an already-cramped city with nothing for immigrants to really do except cost the city and state money.
In other words, apples and orange.
With that said, I suppose I can understand the schadenfreude you're feeling seeing the pro-immigrant side bitching about immigrants 😋😂
NYC controls most the money in the state. No town on the texas border comes close to the kind of capital and resources NYC has.
So NYC doesn't have any entry level jobs available??? No manual labor jobs in one of the largest cities in the country??? Nothing? Lol... they certainly ly have more housing than any border town would. And hey.. they did say they were a Sanctuary City willing to provide for any who came.. Texas atleast is straight up saying.. no!! We don't have the resources for these people!!
The irony here..can't believe I'm saying this..
you sound bigoted.. like the only work these people can do is pick vegetables or some shit lol...
NY has a lot of farmland outside the city.. but there's less "resources" anyway out in rural America for these people
No I'm just saying logistics-wise you're comparing THE ENTIRE state of Texas--where land is cheap, there's lots of room, and it's essentially half-Hispanic as it is--to the teeny tiny city of New York, where everything is expensive and there's not really a lot of places to go.
It's just not a good comparison nor a fair one to make.
Competition is high in NYC for born US citizens, let alone immigrants; less so in Texas.
If you're going to put immigrants somewhere, it might as well be where a.) they're needed, b.) there's more opportunity, and c.) it will benefit both sides.
I know it sounds bigoted but sorry not sorry living in California my whole life you see the Central Valley where some towns are basically 100% Hispanic, and it's all agriculture. Yes obviously immigrants can do anything (my cousin married one and she is a lawyer) but going by trends and demographics a lot of immigrants will work in restaurants, service industry, or agriculture. There's a lot more of that in, again, the entire state of Texas than there is in NYC.
I don't like political theater and treating it like it's a sport where we are rivals, and I will always [try to] be pragmatic; immigration is good for the state of Texas and immigrant alike, whereas shipping them off to NYC is bad for both.
Could give two shits if the mayor is a Republican or Democrat or Communist. This isn't about politics until it is forced to be; this is about fucking with innocent people simply because they crossed a border, and that's wrong.
If Texas wants to look a gift horse in the mouth and ship their immigrants to "asylum cities" in an act of political point scoring, then those cities should a.) get more funding, and b.) Texas should get less funding. And remember, we live in a country where Red states get more funding and contribute less to the economy than blue states.
Log in to comment