@boxrekt said:
Digital Foundry's latest take on xbox Scarlet's hardware and what it means in terms of real world capability.
- Teraflop metric becoming meaningless with AMD Navi arch*
- More to performance and pixel pushing than TF.
- AMD 9.75TF Navi RX57XT = 14% MORE capable than 13.7TF RXVega64
- 25% increase in IPC
- SOC size estimate of 365 - 380mm2
- An estimated 48 cu's with 44 active.
Ron and Torm, red corner are you ready? Blue corner are you ready?
That would be true if you are comparing Navi vs Vega.
If you are comparing Navi vs Navi then don't tell me Flops are meaning less,because there is no way in hell AMD sell you a 9.75TF Navi that perform worse than a cheaper 8TF navi get were i am going with this?
Comparing Tflops across different hardware is problematic and not optimal,comparing Tflops between the same architecture will yield an advantage for the one with higher Tflops.
Is like comparing the RX2080 ti vs the 2070 regardless of the 2080 architecture been more efficient than the previous 1080 one ,comparing GPU across the same family would still be effective and would still show an advantage for the higher Tflop GPU.
Who knows why Richard Leadbetter do this as he is MS ass kisser all the way,and i remember how he downplayed a 40% gap in performance between the xbox one and PS4 but hyped the same 40% advatage for PC as been massive,when the topic was 1080p vs 900p.
This smell like pre damage control.
I was going to make a thread about that video,but was about the fact that sony confirmed 8 cores while MS didn't,according to Richard Leadbetter.
Which would imply that MS went fr 4 cores 8 threads with faster and more efficient Ryzen,while sony went with an 8 core 16 threads one.
Log in to comment