This is so stupid it’s actually making me a little mad.
THE GAME JUST CAME OUT A FEW YEARS AGO
WHY TF WOULD YOU REMASTER THAT
This is so stupid it’s actually making me a little mad.
THE GAME JUST CAME OUT A FEW YEARS AGO
WHY TF WOULD YOU REMASTER THAT
Because they believe their customer base lacks constraint and will pay top dollar for very little. They aren't wrong.
@TheEroica: i'd like to say its sad, but I personally went out and bought re4 remake day 1, so...I guess im part of the problem. At least in my case I can be forgiven, since it was a remake of a 19 year old game. Mean while, this game is like 2 years old, and already talks of a remaster. Compare that to MS with xbox...they just quietly updated the MCC and gears of war, plus a bunch of other games with updated graphics, for FREE of charge. Let that sink in for a minute.
Scumbag sony is actually charging $70 for this scam. The funnier thing is pc fans get milked just as hard 2 years post release for $70. Consumers sure are dumb as heck.
I actually been waiting for it to come out. Ghost of Tshushima and FF7 got PS5 native versions. Those games came out the same year. The first last of us got a remaster a year after it came out. I for one will buy it when it comes out
Good to see that more n more people begin to meme Sony for this. Can't be good for PR.
@TheEroica: i'd like to say its sad, but I personally went out and bought re4 remake day 1, so...I guess im part of the problem. At least in my case I can be forgiven, since it was a remake of a 19 year old game. Mean while, this game is like 2 years old, and already talks of a remaster. Compare that to MS with xbox...they just quietly updated the MCC and gears of war, plus a bunch of other games with updated graphics, for FREE of charge. Let that sink in for a minute.
Scumbag sony is actually charging $70 for this scam. The funnier thing is pc fans get milked just as hard 2 years post release for $70. Consumers sure are dumb as heck.
19 years is a waaaay bigger difference than 3. I don't think you're part of the problem. What people are seeing is what I have said all along, these companies only have so many resources and they choose to apply those resources to remaking games, meaning there are less people working on NEW compelling content. That's really sad to see happen to a developer with the pedigree of Naughty Dog (pardon the pun).
So what does this studio make? The same games over and over, a rumored but never shown Multi-player last of us game no one wants and something else? No one knows...
Now ask yourself, if people could identify that they themselves are bogging our hobby down by rebuying the same game every couple of years from this developer, would Naughty dog be making you wait TEN years between new ip?
@TheEroica: that is the sadder point what Sony has done to naught dog.
If not for the scam remasters naughty dog might have continued with uncharted, or even the multi-player tlou, or even a brand new ip. Instead sony has neil drugsman and co doing remasters of remasters and selling for $70. Worst is the pc fans who think theyre getting a good deal by paying $70 for a 10 year old game with a face lift.
Anybody buying the remasters of these games for full price should be ashamed of themselves.
We need more people like ghosts.
That is really weird. I can understand if it is a game that came out like 10 years ago, but this soon?
TLOU2 is universally one of the GOATs, but come the **** on Sony who even wanted this.
We wanted PS5/PC ports of Bloodborne, not another TLOU2 remaster.
The Last of Us Part 1 (remake) is a top 20 best selling game this year in NA.
The TV series was *huge* and, theres's absolutely an appetite for newcomers of the series.
Wouldn't surprise me. It's why they didn't upgrade TLOU2. Charge 80 bucks for a remaster with weird faces down the line.
I love Sony's new MO.
Let's release remasters or remakes of our 3-4 year old games that don't need it and re-release them for the price of a brand new game! lol please...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment