Quake 2 remaster = £7.99 RedDeadPleb port = £49.99 We feel it's justified. Because. Give money.

@BassMan said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@BassMan said:

@Xtasy26: The Strogg are lame and so is their homeworld. Nothing about the art direction and design was impressive back then and even less so now. The colour palette and overall level design is dull too. I never really enjoyed Quake 2 campaign, but I had a lot of fun with the MP. Quake 2 is worse than Quake 1 except on a technical level. Obviously, the engine is superior.

Again, which game had objectively better art direction at that time in 1997? Campaign between Quake 1 and Quake 2 that can be subjective. Depends on some people like the Lovecraftian level design vs futuristic robotic Strogg world.

Think about what you are asking...

And...which game had better art direction? I did think yet, you can't seem to come up with an answer where a game had better art then Quake 2 at the time. Since you claim there art direction wasn't "impressive" for its time. So which game art direction that was "impressive" for its time?

I will wait.

I'm really interested to see some sales numbers on RDR port.

Who else but bro gamers would've bought this at full price?

@R4gn4r0k: Switch owners who never played it.

Switch owners have so much to play. Like those Pikmin 1+2 games or Mario Wonder or GOTY's like Zelda.

Have they really never had the chance to play this game in the decade it was out already?

Part of me is willing to accept this game sold really poorly.

@R4gn4r0k: Ah yes, for sure it wasn't a bestseller but probably it was really cheap to "remaster".