I think my time on these boards is done. Things have gotten to a point where I can't post anything without being subjected to personal attacks. I merely asked a question and never expressed any judgments, yet several posters have already insulted me. At this point, I'm just genuinely annoyed at the community here, which was the only thing keeping me here despite the changes made to the site.

I know that some of you will rationalize your unwarranted onslaught by citing supposedly "stupid shit" I've posted in the past as examples, but just keep in mind that though some of what I've posted in the past may have been in disagreement with how you felt/ feel, I've never personally attacked anyone and certainly not as harshly as some of you have done to me.

Anyhow, after scrambling my password, I will be changing the email address associated with this account to a new one with a password I won't bother remembering.

I merely asked the question; I've expressed no judgments. Also, I've never harmed Human beings (without justification).

FYI, I'm merely posing the question. I'm still going to see Age of Extinction.

Despite how well known Mark Whalberg is, the criminal antics of his troubled teenage years don't seem to be known at all. When he was fifteen, he threw rocks at Black children while calling them the N-Word - on two separate occasions! When he was sixteen, he attacked a middle-aged Vietnamese man with a wooden stick, knocking him unconscious - all the while yelling out racial epithets. However, these aren't the worst of his crimes; the same day he attacked the Vietnamese man, he attacked another Vietnamese man and beat him so badly that the man permanently lost sight in one of his eyes! He was sentenced to two years, but served only forty five days.

So, I beg the question: Should Whalberg's films be boycotted?

He's so bad that he's amusing. He's his own gimmick; the mere fact that he's Nicolas Cage is entertaining.

Ad hominem.

I interpret divorce as an involuntary end to a marriage, because due to emotions - which cannot be controlled - one or all parties of the marriage no longer feel(s) that the marriage can work. Yes, the legal/ civil procedures through which a divorce is conducted are voluntary (at least on the end of one spouse), but the emotions which cause the desire for a divorce are involuntary.

Jesus is deceased. He's never coming back.

I amended my post with the following: 'In other words, a single heterosexual parent should be allowed to raise children only if they are a single parent involuntarily.'

Why do homosexuals want to adopt children anyway? If they want children so badly, why don't they go and make their own? Oh, wait. They can't!