@Snugenz: Souls started on PlayStation. Sony paid From to make a similar game. They didn't pay From to make Dark Souls III exclusive to PlayStation. Next?
Bloodborne, same franchise, get a fucking backbone and give up the sad ass hypocrisy.
@DressYouUp: It failed. PlayStation gets ROTR next year. Xbox never gets SFV or Kojima's next game!!
I thought you hated developers keeping games from a platform?.
I don't like established multiplats going exclusive. Won't stop me from rubbing it in a lem's face though.
I'm all for any publisher funding new IPs.
Where was your hatred over Bloodborne being PS4 only, sure it has a different name but lets call a spade a spade here, it's a souls game and therefore part of an established multiplat franchise. I would've loved to have played that on PC where the majority of the other souls games are best played, but i had to play it on PS4.
@StrongBlackVine: best to ignore @Snugenz dudes a rabid xbox fanboy lol
Not at all actually but not surprising you'd think that seeing as you seem to have a very poor grasp on reality, you're also a terrible troll. Toodles.
Get Siege, instead. The game's nuts, and some of the DLC is free.
I really like Siege's DLC policy. I suppose the microtransactions could have been handled better, but from what I hear, they're very rarely a problem anyway.
Apart from booster packs (increase the in-game currency earn rate) the micro-transactions are entirely cosmetic so not a problem at all really.
Log in to comment