@FelipeInside said:
@PredatorRules said:
@FelipeInside: This game doesn't bring anything new to the table neither, you can land on planets on Elite Dangerous as well, are you excited about gathering stuff? Minecraft will do that for less money and with more content.
Biggest map? doubt they've pass Arma 3 sized maps, you can walk for hours on foot from side to side, someone recorded talking a heli from side to side at 170Mph it took him 7 min.
I don't know much about Elite but does it also have procedural generated planets, wildlife and flora? Like I said before, NMS is a bit bare at the moment. It's more of a crafting simulator with exploration and a bit of combat. I'm more excited about the technology and what the future brings. Even NMS with some more features will probably get better.
As for map size, I'm talking about the whole universe simulated into the game. It was said it would take someone 5 billion years to explore the whole map. Arma3 map is huge, but it's just one region. A planet in NMS is that, a WHOLE planet sized map.
E:D will eventually have atmospheric worlds landable with animals and plants and cities, but to a realistic level. It' isn't 'fantasy' like NMS, it's based on reality. NMS planets are not realistically sized, but the ones in E:D are true to life. Driving in your buggy in ED on a planet, it would take real time to cross a world.
Map size isn't hard though, ED has 400 billion systems, players have seen 0.0017%, around 30mil systems. Space Engine, made by one guy, has the entire known universe with even higher fidelity than ED, and zero loading screens between any point in the universe. It's about 1gb for the file.
Log in to comment