Epstein Court Documents to be Released this week

https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-associates-what-we-know-names-revealed-1856886

Hundreds of sealed court filings about the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are to be made public this week.

Why Is This Important?

Several prominent names—including that of former President Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew—are expected to be mentioned in the documents.

Interesting stuff,

so these documents are finally being released to the public, will be interesting to see how deep it goes. At one time seen as conspiracy and now a global story compromising some of the world's richest and most powerful people. An island where elites take part in sex trafficking of minors.

Will anyone actually face any consequences?

Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z

Are they releasing information about anyone on the plane or do they have actual evidence of those who were involved with the underage girls?

Hopefully they are able to pay thousands to girls they have never met.

Careful with those sweat glands as well.

Oddly enough your OP forgot the most relevant and popular person who is likely on that list:

Donald Trump,

Clinton, Trump were frequent fliers on Epstein's 'Lolita Express' jet (nypost.com)

Just names mentioned in the relevant court documents, no evidence of illegality. Not sure if we'll ever know who actually paid for services by Epstein's victims unfortunately.

@robertos: Lots of business, but no customers. How odd.

@robertos: "Oddly enough your OP forgot the most relevant and popular person who is likely on that list:"

I was just about to point this out. Trump's faithful are conveniently forgetting his years-long association with Epstein.

Soon the excuse will be "Well he was undercover on a secret mission from... hmmmm....oh yeah, from God."

@statisticalpc: Noticed this on teh social media.

All like"ahhh Bill Bill Bill Bill" with dramatic music and shit some of these cringe inserting a clip of Trump talking about gawd, and le moral values lol

Jesus.

Well, I hope they can do this in a way that protects the identities of victims while exposing monsters, on any side of the political spectrum, for who they are.

I also hope we don't offer any deals to guilty parties simply due to their status or wealth, and throw the book at them. I'm generally not a fan of punitive sentences when it comes to our justice system and feel that rehab should be the goal, but in this case I think there is a huge lesson or warning to be issued if there are a lot of wealthy, powerful individuals accused and found guilty.

In either case, this will take years to figure out.

@robertos said:

@sargentd said:

Several prominent names—including that of former President Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew—are expected to be mentioned in the documents.

Oddly enough your OP forgot the most relevant and popular person who is likely on that list:

Donald Trump,

Clinton, Trump were frequent fliers on Epstein's 'Lolita Express' jet (nypost.com)

lol the best thing about this .gif is how even a scumbag like Epstein appears to be barely able to tolerate Trump. Don looks like an excited little boy just talking and talking and Epstein gives this placating little nod and smile but the body language is like "dude get the **** away from me"

Anyway, on topic: it would be poetic if abuse of women is what took Trump out of the race (and, perhaps, life entirely).

Granted, all the other dozens of crimes (felonies, specifically) he is accused of would be nice, too, but I feel the women out there need some justice.

@DEVILinIRON said:

Ironicaly matt groaning was another one who's been know to be on epsteins flight logs

Trumps spoken on it, said he had caught flights between New York and Flordia at donor events epstien was also attending and he was offered to use his jet to get back. Trump also had a falling out with the guy and barred him from being allowed at his golf coarses. Lines up honestly with the info Zaria shared, we will see if anything more comes out with the release with trump.

The reason bill Clinton and prince Andrew's names are thrown around more.

Because Bill Clinton's times mentioned in these files is higher than most, he also had an alias given to him for his logs "Doe 36" which is pretty weird. Also epstien has a custom oil painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress and red heels hung up in his house, like it's the first thing you see when you walked into the home.

Prince Andrew was directly named by the girl victim that kind of blew the whole thing up, she sued him directly, and prince Andrew settled out of court for like 15 million.

Let's get meta about it

There's a literal photo of him with the girl. Him meeting with Epstein again (after he was first convicted) And his interview, which, I don't know what fucking planet he was on.

Apparently after the interview he showed them around the Palace under the impression he convinced everyone.

Said in the other thread, it is incredibly embarrassing and downright ridiculous that this guy is walk around at public events. He should be sitting in a jail cell. Or hung, preferably.

Though there is speculation of hundreds of elites doing nefarious shit with Epstein. Prince Andrew imo is the most clear cut case where something bad was definitely done, the testimony from the victim and him paying out that much money.. I don't disagree with you, ridiculous nothing more has happened to that guy

Ya I still just can't comprehend how Andrew has any sort of public life or serves in official capacity in any sense.

Though I feel that way about all royalty. But Andrew especially.

I don't know, maybe they're like "Well we settled and paid 15 mil so it's done and over, back to business ol' sport, eh wot?"

@sargentd said:

@DEVILinIRON said:

Ironicaly matt groaning was another one who's been know to be on epsteins flight logs

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1274343/simpsons-creator-matt-groenings-sweaty-crusty-toes-nearly-made-epstein-sex-slave-puke-during-lolita-express-foot-rub/

@sargentd said:

@sargentd said:

@DEVILinIRON said:

Ironicaly matt groaning was another one who's been know to be on epsteins flight logs

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1274343/simpsons-creator-matt-groenings-sweaty-crusty-toes-nearly-made-epstein-sex-slave-puke-during-lolita-express-foot-rub/

I believe his toes would be "krusty" in this case, not crusty.

Hey hey hey!

Yikes!

@DEVILinIRON: 🤣😂

I expect another war to start soon, maybe China going after Taiwan. Or perhaps a major terrorist attack, or another “natural disaster”.

Sure, but we also know at least one woman claimed Trump and Epstein raped her at one of Epstein's properties in 1994, when she was 13 years old. She later withdrew her court filings because she claimed to receive a lot of death threats.

So I don't think we can simply accept Trump's word about this. If you don't believe unlikely excuses (like with Prince Andrew), and you're happy with investigating a former president (Clinton), then you should have no objections with thoroughly investigating Trump as well - and seriously considering any claims made against him.

This sort of thing goes beyond politics. Rape allegations need to be investigated no matter which tribe they come from.

I'd like to give folks the benefit of the doubt here and say that, yes, we could all agree that rape allegations transcend party lines and we can all agree that everyone should be investigated pending proof and allegations.

But the far-right and the Republican party they have hijacked are the party of "rules for thee, not for me" and while I don't think they're all necessarily supporters of rape, some of the supporters of the alt-right movement might have their blinders on and should not be expected to be remotely impartial when it comes to Trump, con artists in his orbit, and other supporting extremists.

It's why we are already seeing this kind of behavior, presenting democrats as lecherous perverts and Donald "pussy-grabbing, cheating on my pregnant wife with a pornstar" Trump as a christ-like figure.

It's a game to them, and games are meant to be won. There is no big-picture at stake , there is no greater good to them. Only winners and losers and if rape victims and justice have to get tossed under the bus so they can win, well...

Ahh leave it to a super partisan tribals to turn this political and start defending a sexual predator in a thread that was supposed to bash such people, especially if they are likely on this list. The Trump cult never disappoints, he's spiting his own thread.

Trump speaking on anything is not reliable, he lies about literally everything. You know this. Using it as a defense is like bringing up Prince Andrew's random quotes.

Trump also was accused of raping a 13 year old girl with Epstein, playfully joked about Epstein's tastes, factually did fly on the Epstein plane, was his good friend, has credible sexual assault cases/allegations against 20 other females, and was found to be a literal rapist in court last year.

Why in the living hell are you defending Trump in an Epstein thread 😂🤣, that's SUPER CREEPY.

Getting giddy about the log while creepily defending Trump is again foolish,

Why can't you be a normal human being and against both for their sexual assaults and allegations, and be weary of anyone in this list instead of vehemently defending one like you're totally for this kind of behavior.

I don't see anyone else ITT defending any of these men except you and it's super creepy stuff.

@robertos: I don't imagine he will wholeheartedly abandon Trump, but at the very least he should put himself on a "time out" as far as supporting Trump goes.

Right?

Kind of a shitty hill to die on. Defending a certified rapist, adulterer, con man, and potentially a child rapist.

Talk all the smack you want about others, just don't exclude Trump from it.

@sargentd: I don't think anyone here has any interest in defending Clinton. Anyone?

@mattbbpl: the silence on it and deflection to Trump tells me enough

PS: my favorite T Shirt

The thread literally is about Trump. He's one of the top 3 people speculated to be on the list since he's literally already on Epstein's list....We were just pointing out you skipped the most popular and powerful person from the original post.

We were correct/fixing your thread. Relax. I said to be weary about everyone on the list in my last post.

Huh? My very first post and link ITT said Clinton. Clinton is probably scum and he should be looked into considering his extent in all of this. You're the one who went out of your way to skip out on Trump and made the thread oddly and bizarrely biased from the first post. You defended Trump, I did not and will not defend Clinton.

Prince Andrews and Clinton have disturbing pasts and lets see what they really did with Epstein given the potential name drops. See how easy that was for me to say? I won't defend them, I'm not like you.

The subject directly involves Trump, again he's the top 3 people speculated to be on the list. I didn't turn a blind eye on Clinton, you already brought him up in the OP and covered it just fine.

Furthermore my first post's link mentioned Clinton...

Many (if not most) of Epstein's victims were raped in NYC and Palm Beach. His plane and crimes didn't just go to the island. You're forgetting all of those creepy house parties with Epstein and Trump in NA, the ones with rape allegations involving both men.

Because you already covered those other two just fine, and I actually did reference Clinton in my source. I'm bringing up the thing you intentionally skipped due to your tribal cult like politics. You won't see me defending any of these three, again, because I'm not disturbed.

Sarge is deeply embarrassed.

He made a thread to blast potential and formerly accused sexual abusers (Clinton and Andrews) in regards to a case involving a confirmed sexual abuser (Epstein)...as they SHOULD be blasted. But then directly and strongly defended a potential serial sexual abuser and confirmed rapist (who he very oddly left out of the OP) in the same thread because said guy is part of his political party....

There's only one guy ITT defending any of these goons, the worst of the three at that (legally). A very bad look.

By the way their link goes further than you think,

Trump Defends Labor Secretary Acosta Over Epstein Plea Deal : NPR

lol pretty much!

News: Epstein list to be revealed blah blah blah

Everyone but alt right: great, let the courts at it.

Alt-right: YEAH BUT NOT TRUMP JUST LIBERALS RIGHT!?! BOoO CLINTON!

what does the silence say?

And sorry, who is deflecting again?

A bunch of Democrats and Republicans both about to get exposed, possibly including Clinton and Trump.

@mrbojangles25: zaryia

Bored of waiting, where is the list?

Hillary likely sniped the courier sending it.

Hmmm

#BREAKING: Jeffrey Epstein list delayed until at least Jan. 22https://trib.al/SeT4fNM

Wtf why? Let me guess many on the list are super powerful and influential and delayed it to somehow get their names redacted.

We don't know.

But yes.

I imagine knowing who his business associates are will not be as revealing as knowing what context of those associations. He no doubt with his wealth commingled his shady activities with seemingly legitimate ones. But it will no doubt open pandora's box of suspicion on everyone named.

His wealth is largely a mystery though. I've no doubt his notorious hedonistic parties were part of an extortion scheme to get money and or leverage business dealings. Though even if he acquired money through such means, I imagine too he would want to put that money in hands of others possibly in manner that to the other party would seem like a legitimate business investment. Of course, when it comes to business, the concept of due diligence still might weigh liability to an unwitting participant.

I feel the knee jerk response of such a list of Epstein's associates will brand all those mentioned as part of some pedophile sex ring, which might be irresponsible to just release a list of known associates without adding context of those relationships.

Hard to get a grasp of the scope of what the names mentioned will include, but I have heard they will include those of victims, witnesses, and targets Epstein planned on roping into his criminal enterprises.

The list has been released, and it seems media are reviewing the approx. 1000 page document. Individuals still being referred to as John/Jane Doe, so hopes aren't too high on what this will reveal.

This is bullshit and everyone knows it and these pricks still get away with it.

What in the actual hell.

I don't care if half of Hollywood, the US Senate, Congress, and some former presidents are on there. I don't care if my favorite actor, video game developer, and college roommate is on there. Release the names!

They have, but I can't find it yet. Multiple news sources have written articles stating they're reviewing the documents. I think one individual tried to hold up the release due to living in a "conservative" country, hence the Jan 22nd date, but it seems to have been dismissed.

Found the release for those interested.

Link.

Seems they're getting slammed with traffic.

@uninspiredcup: Saw that an email denied his participation in an underage orgy... The fact that needed to be clarified is fucking hilarious.

He could have been pretending all along.

From the other Israel thread, since it's related to this topic...

@Jag85 said:

The lawyer who Netanyahu hired to defend Israel against genocide charges in UN international court is Alan Dershowitz, who previously defended Jeffrey Epstein and is now named in the leaked Epstein documents as a pedo rapist:

This account from an Epstein victim appears to exonerate Michael Jackson of any wrongdoing:

86 entries for “Mar-a-Lago”. 😳