I've been really enjoying Season 8 so far. Episodes 1 and 2 were great for building up tension between characters, building existing character relationships and also forming new ones.
Episode 3 was a strong episode, and I really enjoyed it. The whole way through I was on the edge of my seat, and couldn't contain my nerves. The start of the episode was really great, I love how they managed to create fear into me as a watcher, it was really convincing that this was literally a battle against death itself. Some of the shots were beautiful, the dragon CGI was amazing, and the actors really went all-out to create what is a truly convincing performance of a battle against an enemy that is almost undefeatable.
However, there are a few plot points I think need to be addressed.
I thought that the Dothraki charging with their flaming swords into the darkness as imagery was incredible. And the silence afterwards was really eerie. The fact that only a few ran back, including Ser Jorah, felt real and convincing to me. However, I did not like that they just threw Ghost in running alongside Ser Jorah, to not be seen or heard of for the rest of the episode. This is a minor gripe, but it really ruined the enjoyment of that part of the episode for me. I was left a little disappointed, as Ghost's role in Season 8 was rumoured to be important, yet all he's done so far is stand next to Jon whilst he has a conversation with Edd and Sam in Episode 2, and run alongside Ser Jorah. I believe he's still alive, I think you can see him in the preview teaser for episode 4, but it wasn't made clear in the show and why would he not be seen anywhere in the battle afterwards?
The dragon stuff was all A+, it was something that I've never seen before and some of the visuals, such as them flying up over the clouds, were really something else. However, what was the point of Daenerys and Jon both sitting together on what appears to be a hill, overlooking the slaughter of her army? I am glad she decided to break with the plan, because it fits with her character: I find it hard to believe that Dany would ever have just simply stood there and waited for the Night King, watching her people die who she has come so far with, just for the sake of saving some kid she doesn't really know, and who isn't really important to her. I'm not purporting to be the script writer or director here, but the dragons are crucial to winning the war. They breathe fire, one of 2 or 3 methods needed to kill Wights. Surely Dany could've provided the much needed air support by killing Wights right at the beginning, whilst Jon waits for the Night King in what is surely a more meaningful role for him.
Also I think we need to talk about character deaths here. I have a love-hate relationship with how few characters died in this episode. I love it because they are literally all of my favourite characters, and I did not want any one of them to die in such a horrible way. However, this is Game of Thrones. There were a few instances where it would've been very easy to kill Sam, or even Brienne, who has satisfied her character arc and, in terms of plot, I don't really see any furtherance to the plot or her character that could be provided by having her around. Brienne is one of my favourite characters, but I still thought it a questionable decision on their part to keep her alive. The deaths that did happen, however, were satisfying to all of the characters and were, mostly, really brave. Heroic deaths for Jorah, Edd, Theon, Beric and Lyanna was a really nice touch, and a nice way to say goodbye to all of these characters.
I was disappointed that a main character didn't at least die in the crypts, where it would've been most appropriate. However, I really liked the Tyrion and Sansa stuff, and Missandei putting them both in their place was a nice touch.
I thought, like most people, that Bran was totally pointless in this episode. He understood the importance of himself to the Night King, and yet did nothing. What was the purpose of Bran, what has been the purpose of Bran, if not to help in some way to defeat the Night King, other than to provide bait? I don't know what I expected from Bran, as I'm not sure of the extent of his powers, but I didn't expect him to just sit in his wheelchair and warg into some ravens, and that be the end of it. Perhaps we will get more clarity in the next episode.
Finally, the main gripe I have. Arya killing the Night King was fantastic. I didn't expect it and fully expected everyone to die. I thought the way it was done was really good, and I like that it was her as we've kinda been waiting for a moment like this for Arya for some time. I know her being a general badass and killing the Frey's etc was really cool, but she's always been fiercely loyal to her family, and it's nice to see that here.
What I have an issue with is the point of this entire battle, the point of the war council in particular. It seems to be implied that Bran, Melisandre, Beric all knew that Arya needed to kill the Night King. Perhaps that's me reading too much into things, but that's how it appears to me. Bran gave her the dagger in the same place, Melisandre told her she would shut brown, green and blue eyes forever, etc. Obviously Melisandre wasn't at the war council, but Bran was. Surely if Bran knew that it was Arya who would kill the Night King, would it not be better to have NO army out there, and simply to have the dragons lighting the army of the dead on fire, whilst Arya hangs out with Bran and Theon (if he so wishes) waiting for the Night King? Why didn't he say something?
I'm trying to avoid general nitpicking about the silliness of the battle and stuff like that, as I actually thought bits of it were really cool and, from a visual perspective, far more impressive than having it all organised and orderly. I thought Jon having a much less heroic role than he has in the past was good; although it doesn't serve his character all too well, they played it convincingly when he was trying, but unable, to get to Bran. I think we all understand Jon to be a hero, and this episode was about the general heroes, such as Brienne, Jaime, Jon etc, being subverted to make way for more unexpected heroes, such as Arya, Theon or even Dany, although it could be argued that she has always been considered a hero.
Daenerys is not my favourite character, but I like her a lot and one of my biggest gripes from Episode 1 and 2 is the writers trying to hint that she's going to turn into a Mad Queen. Dany has lost one of her dragons, and bought her whole army for the slaughter, in a battle that does not concern her. She didn't need Jon or the North's help to defeat Cersei and her army, as she had three dragons and a far larger army. Instead she chose to help, because that is who she is: kind and good. After this episode, any writing trying to make Dany out to be 'mad' is something I'm not gonna buy. She stopped more people from being slaughtered unnecessarily by hopping on Drogon and burning some Wights. When Jon was facing an uphill battle with Viserion and the Night King, it was Dany who came to his aid and threw the Night King off Viserion. It was Dany who tried to kill the Night King. It was Dany who, when Jon was faced with the impossible task of killing all the Wights who the Night King had just resurrected, saved his ass once again, and it was Dany who picked up a sword and started helping Jorah fight. I'm honestly glad that this episode had so much heroic Dany stuff, because I was getting concerned that the writers were genuinely going to make her a Mad Queen, which would totally fly in the face of her character and everything she has done.
Log in to comment