Jankarcop's forum posts

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@waahahah said:
@foxhound_fox said:
@waahahah said:

I feel like this is more of a popular opinion and less of fact...

It's fairly evident to people who have played all four games.

But so far all i see is new vegas is better... ok. Enlighten us. NV started out in a narrative shit hole, you have amnesia after being shot in the face, buried, and lost some sort of package, also here's a desert. It had some factions that were in the original fallouts... cool. Doesn't make it better, and people constantly beat the drum that NV was better without much to back it up. Then its like pick a faction and its more about factions than any real story ark... so I murdered everyone. At least it let me do that.

1. Better story and location. The Capitol sewers were terrible, as were all the blocked off wall sections in the middle areas. The story was stupid daddy fetch trash and had no factions or real consequences.

2. Factions and more/better quests:

3. http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout:_New_Vegas_weapons

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout_3_weapons

4. Survival mode.

5. Better dialogue choices, skill/special checks, more rpg stuff overall.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@blueinheaven said:

Pillars has wildly outdated boring hit and miss combat and some of the worst voice overs in videogame history. It's for people who used to like videogames 'in the old days' and can't be doing with all this new fangled stuff.

FO4 will never be the worst Bethesda game on any level in a world where Skyrim exists.

Well you are entitled to your opinion, but my opinion is backed up by public and critic consensus. I personally enjoyed POE more than FO4.

Pillars and Skyrim both obliterates FPS4, which is barely even an RPG.

Hopefully Obsidian get a shot at a new Fallout, so we can get the RPG version this time.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

No wonder pc ends up with the most games, they get funneled to it from competing systems.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@clone01 said:
@Jankarcop said:

**** yes

@Pray_to_me said:

Fallout 3 was better than New Vegas and the people who say otherwise are on some hipster bullshit.

Lmao what. NV is insanely superior.

ANyways, it won't be hard to improve on FO4. It's bethesda's worst game so far, even according to MC.

So you only like things that are popular, Sniper? Explains a lot.

FO4 is extremely popular. It's just seen as the worst bethesda game accross every aggregate.

Pillars was better. A obsidian FO4 would be better.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

FN has more quests, weapons, better rpg features, survival mode, better story,better writing, better companions, factions, better armor, etc.

It's just too mcuh better

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

Everything. Considering you can easily do everything in 1 playthrough more easier than any other bethsoft game.

It's barely a RPG.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@pantswearer said:

@Jankarcop:

It seems like a legitimate complaint to me. Since when has anyone else been heroes? It's just so very unrealistic and when I go to see a movie like Star Wars I expect realism. Making the bad guy the most pathetic beta male millennial to ever grace the silver screen helped but still.... where was the realism? This franchise has always been more about science than fiction and reality over fantasy in my view.

It's not a legitimate complain. The heroes not being white males is not unrealistic. What the hell are you on about.This is some silly conspiracy bullshit and paranoid as ****.

Please stop while you guys are ahead.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

Did FO3 even have factions? rofl so bad.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@Ballroompirate said:
@Jankarcop said:
@Ballroompirate said:
@with_teeth26 said:

...or they have an appreciation of well developed RPG mechanics, and a well thought out setting, and good writing

Sorry but the story/writing in NV was garbage, "oh hey I'm still alive after getting shot in the face and buried alive", that's a good way to start off a story!! not.

The story/writing in NV is what is universally heralded as the exponentially superior factor vs. FO3...

*Looks at Jankarcop post

*Realizes it's another shit post /nothing new

Can you actually discuss what I said instead of resorting to an actual off-topic shit post yourself?

NV's story and writing are widely considered better to FO3, which is one of the reasons people like it more....I'm not sure how stating that warrants the response you gave. It's actually seen as one of the main reasons, second to the more RPG and content aspects.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

@Ballroompirate said:
@with_teeth26 said:
@Pray_to_me said:

Fallout 3 was better than New Vegas and the people who say otherwise are on some hipster bullshit.

...or they have an appreciation of well developed RPG mechanics, and a well thought out setting, and good writing

Sorry but the story/writing in NV was garbage, "oh hey I'm still alive after getting shot in the face and buried alive", that's a good way to start off a story!! not.

The story/writing in NV is what is universally heralded as the exponentially superior factor vs. FO3...