cooolio's forum posts

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts
@Legend002 said:

@emil_fontz: It's not that groundbreaking. lol

Lol. I like how you said that. Acknowledging the sheer awesomeness but still not letting it overwhelm you.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

Among the games that are being released, Arkham Knight and MGS V will definitely give it a run for its money and probably Rise of The Tomb Raider. Honestly, from what the impressions are saying about MGSV The Phantom Pain, I would say that it will most likely take it it. I am only saying this because while Arkham Knight will no doubt be amazing, I have played enough of the past games to have pretty good idea of the depth of the gameplay on the tactical side of things. Also, I have not played the most recent Tomb Raider and none of us no how far they are pushing things.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@lamprey263 said:
@Jankarcop said:
@lamprey263 said:

how can a Doom game get any simpler or dumbed down?

HP regen, limited weapons, linear maps, auto-aim, QTEs.

Wolfenstein New Order had much of all that and still managed to be quite entertaining.

Yeah.... you got somethings mixed up. limited weapons refers to putting a limit on the amount of weapons that can be carried, but we all know TNO has no limit to the amount you can carry. HP regen stops at 20, I believe. And as oppose to most military shooters, if I am correct, the maps are big enough to allow exploration and support stealth and guns blazing playstyles.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@theboy2100: Glad to help, but I did not intend to be smart or really correct you. A lot of people feel like the game's missions and world are structured too much like an MMO, well maybe just the missions. As much as they wanted to do something different from Halo, it seems like it in a a lot of ways, and a step down too. Well, in my opinion. If anything, they should have added vechilce hijacking or vehicle sabotaging like in Halo. Even some small flying vechiles would have been cool

Ugh. Excuse me for my rant

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

Well, they kept insisting that it was not an MMO, so at least that got that right with you

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

Didn't really play many games when the PS2 launched. Played Jak 2, 3 and X. The most I've played of Ratchet and Clank is Nexus and a demo for one of the future games.

That being said, I just found Nexus to be somewhat fun. Granted, I know Nexus is shorter than the rest, but I'm not a big fan of the shooting focus. But I think that may have more to do with the weapon selection.

I know Jak 2 added guns and made things more serious but I preferred the hub like area and Dark Jak. Oh and the 2 more melee moves it had.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

Almost all of the sex is optional. I think there is a mandatory story related with Geralts lover in this game, that is story related. But you can skip the scene anyway.

Anything other sex acts occur at brothels and are, once again, optional

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@wiouds said:

Off the top of my head I would say:

Halo 5

games that I plan on avoiding:

The Witcher 3 and Mass Effect 4.

Avoid? Y

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@mastermetal777 said:

@Expane: there's one weapon that has a gun built in, so that's something.

Two actually

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@polishkid99 said:

@BboyStatix:

I actually do not like cover shooters that much. I like games that implement some form of cover(far cry, dishonered, gtav), but don't particularly like games that revolve around it (uncharted, gears).

And the worst thing about cover shooters is you know exactly when a shooting scene is coming up because you see a bunch of "cover" knocked down pillars, crates, etc in a boxed area, followed by walking through corridor or jumping around, then there is another cover boxed area around the corner with shooting. It would be great if they could fix the predictability.

Improvment. Shooting legs would cripple, shooting arms/hands knocks gun out of their hand. Shooting arrow in foot sticks them to ground like in shado of mordor.

Sad thing is that RE4 had all of this, minus the arrow. You could even throw an egg at a villagers face and it would stun them. I have heard similar things about Binary Domain. On a side note, the fact that you could pin enemies to the ground with arrows was what impressed me the most about Mordor when I saw that first bit of footage for it. I remember hoping that AC3 would have that whenever I saw that trailer where Conor was hunting that guy down.....what a disappointment