@KungfuKitten:

Agreed. It's a step in the right direction. The PSVR is only going to be capable of console graphics, but plenty of people seem to think that's just hunky dory.

@skipper847:

To get VR on your PS4 you will need the headset ($399) and the camera (~$50). Or you can buy the bundle they recently announced.

Point is, most of us will have to spend between $450 and $500 to get VR on our PS4s. Not quite as cheap as we were led to believe.

That's funny, because nearly every aspect of Uncharted was copied from other games. Go back and read the reviews for Uncharted Drake's Fortune, reviewers complained that it was too much an amalgam of elements from other games and didn't really do enough to create a strong identity of its own.

I don't actually have a problem with remasters. Let those who want them buy them. What I dislike is the lack of backwards compatibility in my consoles. It's a feature of PC gaming that I find very valuable. I dislike having to start over again when I buy a new console.

I also dislike the hypocrisy and inconsistency of many people in the gaming community on these kinds of issues.

About remasters you say "if you don't like them then don't buy them" and I agree with that idea. But wouldn't that also apply to DLC? Some people act like remasters are fine but then turn around and act like DLC is of the devil. I don't understand this mentality. DLC has never really bothered me. I view it as mostly superfluous stuff that hardcore fans might find valuable, but isn't essential for most of us. In the rare cases when it does look substantial and worthwhile to me, I don't mind paying for it. Basically, I buy the DLC I like and ignore the rest.

Lol you cows go through the most hilarious mental gymnastics in a vain attempt to defend your god.

No, Sony would rather sell you the same games for a second or third time than give a solution for backwards compatibility.

It honestly looked like Uncharted 3.5 in some parts. Overall it's a really great looking game. But, predictably, cows are way over-hyping it beyond its true graphical quality, while also downplaying other graphically outstanding games that deserve recognition.

Sony fanboys are the most dishonest, hypocritical group of fanboys around. Every game or feature on another platform is always shit, but when it's on a Sony console suddenly it's the greatest thing ever.

That Uncharted 4 demo was decent, but after the previous mediocre Uncharted 4 gameplay demo I really thought Naughty Dog would bring something more impressive and exciting to the table. The first part (shootout in the marketplace) felt like Uncharted 3.5, both graphically and gameplay-wise, aside from improved destruction. Then they run through the buildings and across rooftops just like we've done many times before in the previous games. Then a fairly heavily scripted setpiece drive down through the town with a handful of obvious alternate turn spots, and a final quick time grapple.

I mean, it's not bad and I know in the balance of the full game it's going to be fun. But the same can be said of the Tomb Raider demo. Escaping that avalanche is a massive setpiece and I think in the context of the game it's going to be great.

I completely enjoyed Tomb Raider 2013 and I'm liking the changes/improvements I'm reading about Rise of the Tomb Raider. I'm still annoyed Microsoft tied it up as a timed exclusive, but whenever it does make it to PC I definitely plan to get it.

I personally liked the Rise of the Tomb Raider demo better than the Uncharted 4 demo. They both could have been better, but I know there's a lot more to both games.

Played through Mirror's Edge on the PC, beat it, loved it. Very happy they are making a new one.

Your opinion is shit, in my opinion. Both games have good gameplay. Talk about being on crack...