The original Bayonetta was praised on the PS3 and 360, so you're wrong on that count. And, from what I've played of Smash 4 with my friends (I don't personally own a Wii-U), that game is so much more than an HD upgrade to Brawl.
Also, you're ignoring a lot of other Nintendo IPs in your argument.
Very few people give a shit anymore what Nintendo are doing they just wait for the inevitable endless regurgitation of kids games with really shit graphics on horrible hardware and sit in the corner talking about 'the good old days' when this shit was actually new and innovative.
Probably not the answer you were hoping for but hey, I'm not going to lie to you.
I'm not sure if Metroid is really a flagship Nintendo franchise.
Anyway, I voted F-Zero.
I know I wouldn't call Metroid a flagship franchise. It was once in the NES and SNES era, but since being absent since 1996-2002 and absent again since 2010-2015 (much to Federation Force's critics dismay) missing the N64 and Pokemon was being on the rise of popularity at the time, it's fair to say Metroid has lost it's place as a flagship title and in the "triforce."
Yeah, to me, to be a flagship franchise, your owners have to actually use said franchise. Wii-U hasn't gotten a Metroid game (and it likely will not at all), and I don't believe that franchise has seen a release on the 3DS at all yet.
I have before. We used a pretty nice one at my college once in the auditorium for a student event. It's interesting, but it's not something I'd go to the trouble to do on a consistent basis.
Log in to comment